This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Schools

Charter Schools Come Down to the Wire

Two sides of the debate come to Livingston as decision nears on new class of charters.

With two charter schools that would teach bilingual immersion days away from learning if they will be allowed to open, the question last night at a debate in Livingston touched this hot-button education issue: Can charter schools and traditional public schools coexist?

The of Livingston brought two of the prominent players to the table: Carlos Perez, president of the New Jersey Charter Schools Association, and Julia Sass Rubin, a founder of Save Our Schools. The room was packed to weigh in on the debate, which state has called “a watershed moment” in education.

The state Department of Education has before it for new charters, including the two Mandarin-immersion schools that would recruit students from Livingston and neighboring districts. Over the summer, the proposed schools were required to and expand how they will assess academic success, according to addendas to their application posted on the Livingston Public Schools website. (See charter school information here).

Find out what's happening in Livingstonwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The tensions have been building over the past six months, especially in the suburban that say these so-called boutique charters will drain money away from public schools already scrapping by. counter that charter schools are public schools and offer opportunities that the traditional schools are failing to address.

“I think that having charter schools are an essential component of the overall array of the public schools available to kids throughout the community,” Perez said during the Wednesday night debate.

Find out what's happening in Livingstonwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

would agree – to a point. Speaking at Temple B'nai Jeshurun in Short Hills, the governor said his support for charter schools isn't limited to urban areas. But over the city line, he said, “there should be a need for that school and a demand for that school.”

The remarks echoed his top education chief -- who last spring said “boutique” charters, such as those offering language immersion programs, might not be needed in suburban districts that are “humming along.”

The two bilingual immersion charter schools, however, are seeking to do just that.

If approved, would serve students from Livingston, Millburn-Short Hills and West Orange school districts. It identifies an empty office park off Route 10 as the school’s potential site, Regent Park.

The would be housed in the St. Joseph’s RC Church on Prospect Avenue in Maplewood and draw students from South Orange-Maplewood, Millburn, Union, West Orange, and Livingston, the application says.

If approved, the schools would open in September 2012 for Grades K-2 and expand over time.

“We think that the example of Charter Schools is one that we can show that when educators and those at the school level have the ability to make decisions on that particular school and those particular kids, education thrives,” said Wednesday night.

Judith Friedman, president of the League of Women Voters of Livingston, welcomed the full house to Livingston. The debate drew residents from all the nearby communities that are affected by the pending decision by the state Department of Education. There is also legislation slowly making its way in Trenton to reform the existing charter school laws. The in the state Assembly but is stalled in the Senate.

 “We think that the New Jersey Charter Law is broken and we think that charter schools and traditional schools can absolutely coexist but the charter law needs to be reformed,” Rubin said on Wednesday night. “It needs to reflect the wishes of the host communities, that’s probably the most dramatic of change.”

Rubin represents Save Our Schools, a grassroots group that has been fighting for the legislation that also guarantees "a standard high level of transparency and accountability which some charter schools currently abide by, but not all,” Rubin said.

Rubin also addressed the disproportionate number of minority and special education students in charter schools. “Charter schools having fewer limited English proficiency students, so fewer immigrants and fewer very poor students, then the traditional school systems from which they come,” Rubin said.

 “There’s a bunch of reasons for that -- not that the charter schools are doing it on purpose -- it’s mostly a function of that you have to apply and so if your parents don’t speak English or if they’re so poor that they’re just trying to put food on the table they probably don’t have the bandwidth to find out about it,” Rubin said.

 “Charter schools are not the enemy per se,” said (D-27th District), during a public forum in Livingston last spring. “They have a role, but we need to define that role and have a say in where they are located and make sure that where they are located they have the support of the community.”

If the charter schools are approved by the NJ Department of Education, the school districts would pick up 90 percent of the cost per student. Livingston, for instance, could expect to pay close to $502,000 for estimated enrollment the first year. That figure is based on 122 students in the charter, with one-third coming from Livingston, according to Livingston councilwoman Deborah Shapiro. (Read more from ). Shapiro is a of Hanyu International Academy.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?